The other question is, "What obligations do *supported* speakers have within a pluralistic, diverse society?" If the answer is nothing, then the next question should be, "What obligations does society have in protecting civil discourse in age when misinformation is so easily published and accessed?"
I think--and I hope--the second question is seen as the more interesting one.
you really went to town on that strawman didnt you
Literally provided multiple non-straw examples
The other question is, "What obligations do *supported* speakers have within a pluralistic, diverse society?" If the answer is nothing, then the next question should be, "What obligations does society have in protecting civil discourse in age when misinformation is so easily published and accessed?"
I think--and I hope--the second question is seen as the more interesting one.
But if we can't blame the victims, we won't be able to blamelessly victimize people!